Sunday, April 21, 2013

Rick Beerhorst Blog Post

Rick Beerhorst,  an interesting figurative painter in Michigan, has run a short interview, The Visual World of Ward Schumaker,  on his blog studiobeerhorst. We found a lot of enjoyment in visiting his site, his paintings have a sweet, surreal quality to them, and his upcoming Beerhorst Family Spring Art Show is an event we'd be attending if we lived near enough. Please check it out.

Here's a copy of his posting:

The Visual World Of Ward Schumaker

Probe, acrylic and photo transfer on wood, 14” x 11” (2012)

























The Landing, acrylic and photo transfer on wood, 14” x 11” (2012)

























Balkan, acrylic on wood, 8” x 6” (2012)

























Afternoon, acrylic and gesso on wood, 7” x 7” x 14” (2012)

















Big Heaven, acrylic and gesso on wood, 7” x 7” x 14” (2012)


















Throne for a New Ubu, acrylic and gesso on wood, 14” x 14” x 7” (2012)
























Introducing the work of Ward Schumaker who is an artist, living and working in San Francisco and showing with Zeitgiest Gallery in Nashville TN.   He is married to artist Vivienne Flesher. Ward and Vivienne just spent a year living and working in New York City and was strongly affected by his time there.  He is a restless artist, creating both in fine art and commercial art. He makes sculpture, paintings, drawings and aritst books. He is an inspiration to me for the way he continues to explore his world and expand and deepen his body of work at the same time.  Ward was kind enough to do an interview with me and send along some images of his new work. Welcome to his world!

1. Ward, what are the earliest memories you have of drawing or making things?
2.  Are there other creatives running through your family history? If so what did they do?

I come from a creative family.

My father’s artistry consisted of drawings; he worked as a civil engineer for the railroad. The high point of his life arrived when he directed the erection of a trio of bridges he designed, for trains, over the Snake River. For three years he lived in one room of a hotel in Weiser, Idaho. In the summer, I would travel there to live with him. Most often he was a stern and sour parent, but perhaps because he was finally and for once, happy, he played frivolous and each morning allowed me to push down the handle that detonated the dynamite that blew holes in the canyon walls. After the dust had more-or-less settled, I would run to the rubble and search for geodes. At night, in the hotel room’s one big bed, I would break open the geodes and admire the crystals inside, sparkling beneath the reading lamp; across the room, my father smoked at a small table, listing how many rivets had been used that week, how many pounds of steel, how many injuries.

At separate times, both my mother and my Aunt Helen acted as sole teacher of a one-room schoolhouse near Cozad, Nebraska. They were artists, and their medium was crêpe paper. They could make anything from crêpe paper, but their gloire derived from the costumes they created: Uncle Sam with stripes and tall hat, Abraham Lincoln with beard and tall hat, Ben Franklin with wig and no hat. By time I was born, my family had moved to the city (Omaha) but weekends we’d return to the country to be with family––and to attend the school’s performances: 20 Polish-speaking kids, 5-8 years old, 19 of them dressed as paper onions; the one non-onion dressed in pink, as a petunia, singing in newly-learned English, “I’m a little, lone petunia in an onion patch and all I do is cry all day.”

So my early life was filled with wonder and culture.

Naturally, I wanted to become an artist. But there was stiff competition: sibling competition. My brother Moishe-Millard constructed highly detailed HO gauge model trains, set in a countryside filled with forests made of lichen and toothpicks, villages of balsa and papier-mâché. My brothers Rand and Roger were dancers, one with snakes in his mouth, the other jumping in and out of fire hoops: each intent on keeping alive native-American culture (though they, themselves, were blond as corn silk). With all this competition, I had to work hard forge a unique identity. Luckily, I chanced upon a Life Magazine article on Jackson Pollack, the article with the famous photos of him dripping paint on a canvas on the floor, and I knew: this is what I have to do to be somebody, to matter. Through Pollack’s aesthetic, I felt I could include it all: bridges, geodes, onions and petunias, and a hundred-fifty bull snakes, dancing through hoops.

4.  I know your wife is also a very gifted artist as well. Do you give each other suggestions or critiques or do you just keep out of the way of each other’s creative process?

If either of us even looks in the direction of a piece of art while the other is creating it, the work must be destroyed; that’s the rule. There can be no exceptions. So we are careful while crossing each other’s territory.  Which for her is upstairs, for me, down. But every once in a while, one comes crying to the other: help, I’ve fallen and I can’t get up. Then one consoles the other. And advises. Unfortunately, the advice never seems to work, not even from such a loving source. But soon after, inexplicably, the unfortunate one finds he’s back at work, a bit further from failure, a bit closer to success. Perhaps the advice did work? Nevertheless in no time the sign is re-hung on the studio door: do not enter, on pain of death.

My wife is the most talented person I’ve ever met (and I’ve known some very talented people); just living with her, day to day, provides me with guidance and instruction. But face it: when you are working on a piece of art, the only answer lies someplace deep inside, with a voice that says: do this, not that.

5.  When I spend time with your work I pick up on a spiritual vibe. Can you say anything about that? Is there a spiritual dimension to your work or am I just projecting that on it?

Most of my work begins with the inquiry: where can I get help on this? And most of the work I prize seems to include the answer: from someplace inside, who knows where. So, though I am totally inept at it, I have meditated 20 minutes a day for 40 years, in hopes of gaining help. But in truth, after all this time, I have little faith in anything except unhappiness and suffering. Still, it’s hard to imagine facing a blank piece of paper without some hope that there is something else out there somewhere.

6. Can you talk a little bit about your year in NYC?

I may live in San Francisco, but I left my heart in New York City. And I’ll be damned if I can explain what happened while living there last year––is there something in the water? All I know is that after many years of painting in the Bay Area, making paintings which all seemed to be done by the same hand, the work I did in New York exploded in three or four directions, an exhilarating if bewildering event for me. It wasn’t the proximity of the million galleries––frankly, I didn’t see much in the galleries that I liked. And it wasn’t the influence of all the artists we met––my wife and I are pretty much loners and we only met a handful of artists. But something happened there and now that we’ve returned to San Francisco, it’s become my job to try to understand that, and to discover anew what to do, how to paint, and why. I’ve just hit my 70th birthday (or did it hit me?) and I find myself a beginner again. I consider that New York’s fault, and I’m truly grateful for that.

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Last New York Paintings

Next week we close our New York studio, after one year's time here, returning to San Francisco in mid-February. It's been a curious neighborhood to work in, just blocks from Times Square, in the Garment District, but it's been great for a transplanted San Franciscan to experience this great city.  We'll miss Manhattan. 


Rotation, acrylic and transfer on wood, 7" x 5"


























Family, acrylic and transfer on wood, 7" x 5"


























Flood, acrylic and transfer on wood, 7" x 5"


























Hold On, acrylic and transfer on wood, 7" x 5"


























Keep It Up, acrylic and transfer on wood, 7" x 5"


























Salvation, acrylic and transfer on wood, 7" x 5"


























Heaven Reach, acrylic and transfer on wood, 7" x 5"


























Wall of works, 24 January 2013


Friday, December 14, 2012

Submarine

Entire Understanding, 14" x 11" transfer and acrylic on wood

























Finally Getting It, 14" x 11" transfer and acrylic on wood

























Imperfectly Motivated, 14" x 11" transfer and acrylic on wood

























Probe, 14" x 11" transfer and acrylic on wood

























Submerge, 14" x 11" transfer and acrylic on wood

























The Key Smudge, 14" x 11" transfer and acrylic on wood

























Century, 14" x 11" transfer and acrylic on wood

























Farnsworth, 11" x 14" transfer and acrylic on wood 



















Disappear 1o" x 8" transfer and acrylic on wood

























Sprout Stick, 10" x 8" transfer and acrylic on wood

























Venetia, 10" x 8" transfer and acrylic on wood


























The Landing, 14" x 11" transfer and acrylic on wood

Friday, December 7, 2012

Miami Art Basel





















above: Ward Schumaker's Nino Rota Heard With One Finger in the Ear (Dumb Box 16)
2012, acrylic, transfers, gesso and paste on wood; 14 x 7 x 6 in.; cat no WAS51     

George Lawson Gallery, Los Angeles and San Francisco,
will be showing small scale works
from a selection of gallery artists
at Aqua Art Miami, Room 103 of the Aqua Hotel,
06 thru 09 December 2012.
If you're visiting Miami Art Basel, please stop by.

For more information, visit:
http://aquaartmiami.com/exhibitors/2012/george_lawson_gallery_2012http://aquaartmiami.com/exhibitors/2012/george_lawson_gallery_2012








Saturday, November 24, 2012

Figure/Ground Interview




For the original online interview, please visit:

http://figureground.ca/interviews/ward-schumaker/  
© Ward Schumaker and Figure/Ground Communication


Ward Schumaker was interviewed by Dr. Julia Schwartz on November 21st, 2012

Ward Schumaker has shown in New York, San Francisco, Shanghai, UC Berkeley, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.. His work is included in the collections of painters Eric Fischl + April Gornick; novelist Isabel Allende; television commentator Rachel Maddow + photographer Susan Mikula; sculptor Cris Gianakos; and gallerists Ivan Karp + Marilyn Gelfman Karp. In Los Angeles Schumaker is represented by the George Lawson Gallery; in Nashville by Zeitgeist; and in Shanghai by Stir. His current show, Dumb Boxes, is on view at George Lawson Gallery in Los Angeles from 17 November until 22 December 2012. He currently lives in New York with his wife, the artist Vivienne Flesher.

What attracted you to the arts? What were your earliest experiences of making art? 
There was never a time that I didn’t identify with being an artist; it seems to have been an inborn identity. As early as the first or second grade I
would request permission to skip recess in order to paint, and in third grade I would remain after school to make pictures because my teacher’s husband made it his habit to pick her up each night and at that time he would critique my work. His words fell on thirsty ears, as my father was not one to compliment his sons. I wanted so much to please this guy and I assumed that as a man he would enjoy “pretty women.” I didn’t know how to draw “pretty women” but I did know how to draw bunnies, so I drew bunnies in harem costumes. Scores of them. Perhaps hundreds. When he hung one in their kitchen, I felt I had truly made it.

Can you describe your firsts projects/exhibitions?
In 1965 I was 22 years old and I needed $400 for the tuition of my last semester of school. I chanced upon a notice in the art department: The Nebraska Governor’s Art Competition, $400 Purchase Prize. I somehow immediately knew I would win. At the same time, I realized the one-color paintings I’d been doing wouldn’t pass muster in such a contest, so I recreated some Renaissance masterpieces in a pop art style (which had just hit the Mid-West). One of them was judged first-place but after the judges had left the state, officials and the governor decided my painting of one figure actually contained three figures, and that the three were committing depraved sexual acts. It was suggested I might prefer removing my work from the competition rather than be jailed for attempting to sell pornography. Out of the kindness of their hearts, the officials offered to pay me the $400, and an extra $25. (Was that some kind of tip?) I accepted their offer, finished school, and left the state. For the most part I also stopped doing, or at least stopped showing, my personal art for the next thirty-five years. At the age of 35 I did, however, begin illustrating for a living, a field akin to art; it wasn’t what I’d imagined for myself when I was young, but at least I got to draw full-time, and I was relatively successful. When I hit the age of 57, my second wife, artist Vivienne Flesher, and my son Matthew suggested I begin painting again. A gallerist from Shanghai saw some of the work and offered me a show.


Can you describe your rituals or routines in the studio––i.e. daily painting versus sporadic, music, etc?
A few months before my son was born, I hosted a meditation group in our house. That’s when I learned to meditate and I’ve done it almost daily
ever since, about 40 years. It seems to me that my best work has been done when I’ve been most successfully involved with my meditation practice, though I’m open to idea that it’s actually the other way around: that the joy I get from successful painting may be the author of successful meditation. The two seem bound together tightly. Not to say that I have an unflagging faith in either. I am filled with doubts about both.
Most often, my meditation consists of sitting each day for twenty minutes, eyes shut, spine upright, repeating a phrase I deem particularly appealing, benevolent, even sacred (the words vary from time to time). Or walking. Much of my best work has been done during periods of daily walking meditation of about one-hour’s duration, repeating a mantra or prayer of some sort.
I do not necessarily believe in God, certainly not a god I can define, and I don’t know what it is that happens when I meditate. It could be I simply reach a deeper part of my Self; or perhaps there is actually Something-Else-Out-There, listening and helping. I would love to know the answer, but I don’t expect to understand, ever. Some things you just do because they work.

What would you say is the impact of your personal life on your work? What about other external influences? Place, politics, family, etc.
I can’t explain what has caused my work to change so much this year, but it has coincided with moving from San Francisco to Manhattan. New York, for me, has been like waking up; I’d lived in California 45 years; perhaps I come to take too much for granted. The move also coincided with a decision to complete sculptures I’d first mocked up in 1966, in my first apartment, in San Francisco; they became the project I’d work upon in my first New York studio. So it’s been a time of completion, as well as change. I find New York to be one of the most generous places I’ve ever lived, similar to the way San Francisco appeared to me in the 60s. People here are considerate and polite, there’s so much intelligence––and funny, New Yorkers are really funny. It’s a joy to live here with them. And there is no escape; in New York, one is always with them. It’ll be interesting to see what happens to my artwork if we return to San Francisco in 2013 (as was the original plan).


Can you describe what you’re working on now?
The wood sculptures I call dumb boxes were first started 46 years ago! At that time I created them in cardboard, with pins and tape and press-type. When I revisited the forms this last year (after all this time, I remembered the exact measurements!) I had them constructed out of wood and I covered the surfaces with gesso, paint, transfers, and type made from hand-cut stencils. It was a time in which we had not only moved across the country to New York, but also one in which I lost a brother, and, temporarily, the vision in one eye––so I was emotionally fraught at times. As I approached each dumb (that is, mute) form, I revisited emotionally heightened events: our family’s battle with another brother’s polio, the death of a young aunt due to leukemia, early (and unwise) religious teachings; plus other types of events, too: the joy of the music of Nino Rota and the films of Federico Fellini, the quiet of meditation, the wonders of 20thcentury art. The intention was to invest these dumb forms with emotion. I enjoy their squat solidity, their refusal to show off, their quiet speech. For me, they work. I hope they do for others, as well.

What’s next?
With the move to New York, my painting has changed, too––it’s smaller and cleaner––and I’m trying to figure out where to go with that. I miss the large messiness of the past, but I’m intrigued by the more tightly defined imagery that seems to want to be painted right now. And text: it seems to be disappearing. I don’t know why. But I’m the last to predict what comes next, as I’ve been so wrong, so often, in the past.
Perhaps most importantly, however, is that my wife and I are trying to decide: can we really leave New York? At the same time: are we ready to give up San Francisco? Many people have told us that to live in New York one must be ready to give up so much. Others have cautioned that to live anywhere else, one has to give up New York. What’s one to do?
































© Ward Schumaker and Figure/Ground Communication. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Ward Schumaker and Figure/Ground Communication with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

George Lawson Dumb Boxes Opening

George installed my dumb boxes just the way I like: quietly and plainly.



















The boxes were set out on white tables, while a few paintings were hung sparsely on the walls, in groups or singly.



































































































































































































































































































































































Meanwhile, in the backroom:
George Lawson, Ward Schumaker, Masaru Kurose